On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Rick \"Zero Chaos\" Farina wrote: > >>> Huh? Savedconfig isn't a solution for the license issue. > >> If he doesn't agree to the license he can use savedconfig to not >> install those firmware packages. > > Yes, but ACCEPT_LICENSE wouldn't work. It would still be necessary to > include all licenses, even for firmware packages that are not > installed. >
I'm sure I'm not the only one who really doesn't care about having ACCEPT_LICENSE work properly for a package full of binary blobs. It seems like a rather insignificant reason to split the package up. If some of the licenses involved are particularly offensive to a large number of people, then it might be worth while to split those particular files out.
