El dom, 10-02-2013 a las 19:47 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: > On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > # Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2013) > > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with > > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old > > # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659). > > # Removal in a month. > > sci-visualization/paraview > > So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we remove > packages now, remove features from other packages because of that > (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay? > > Somehow this appears not well thought out to me. Would anyone be > terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly overlay? (And any other > overlays that look like they are fun) >
That is because looks nobody from sci team has enough time to move things from sci overlay to the tree (probably because it's being maintained there by people without commit access). Ideally that people would become devs with commit rights but, until then, looks like some packages (usually sci maintained packages) are being maintained better in overlay than main tree :/ I guess wouldn't be problems on pillaging ebuilds from that overlay to the tree... but I guess you would be willing to become its maintainer to update ebuilds from overlay when needed :|
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
