On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:02:01 +0100 Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be some > tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured > list in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now. https://bugs.gentoo.org/213514 On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:24:36 -0600 Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On keywording/stabilizing, Bugzilla has a flags feature that might be used to > track what has been tested where. > > Flags have three states: +, -, and ?. + and - are obvious, and ? is a > request. So imagine having a "x86 tested" flag that the maintainer sets to > "?" to request stabilization of their package. An email is sent to the arch > alias notifying them of the request. The arch tester tests it out and sets > the flag to + or - depending on their results. The arch dev stabilizes the > package as normal. > > If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux" > product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that > component would display the flags. We can also make it so only people with > editbugs privileges can request or set flags. -- gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of place @ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is taste
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
