On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:01:52 -0300 Alexis Ballier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Etc. ffmpeg is like the holy grail of local bindist descriptions. > > bindist does absolutely nothing by itself there. do you really want a > description like "Enforces license compatibility constraints" ? > I consider this a subset of the current bindist description. If you > don't then maybe the bindist description should be updated. Well, that's another problem we have there. I really like the ffmpeg idea of 'bindist' not doing anything by itself. If all packages did that, I would see no problem with having global meaningful 'bindist'. But if in some cases USE=bindist does something, then I believe ffmpeg should describe that it just 'enforces REQUIRED_USE contraints' with no hidden magic beneath. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
