On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon > <chain...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > >> Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the > >> council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an > >> initramfs, I am re-considering this. > > > > So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through > > udev, because an alternative now exists... another way must be found? > > That seems rather immature. > > What must be forked next to keep this working? openrc? > > Tend to agree, assuming it causes no additional work for package maintainers.
As I and others have said on this list a thousdand times, moving everything to /usr never had anything to do with systemd and udev. This is a completely separate topic. The arguments for moving everything into /usr seem to be pretty strong [1], and as gregkh and others have said, it would benefit us in the longrun to do it. Given that, that is not even what I'm discussing. I am just discussing moving the libraries that we manually install into /lib* back to /usr/lib* on Linux. William [1] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
pgpNxjovyb3us.pgp
Description: PGP signature
