On Friday 14 December 2012 02:49:08 George Shapovalov wrote: > On Thursday 13 December 2012 12:59:40 Jory A. Pratt wrote: > > But to keep ebuilds for ex. gcc around for over 5 years is just insane. > > I would argue, that stuff like gcc and some other system packages should be > kept forewer. One (working) version per SLOT is enough, but these should > just stay.
i do keep them forever. just for the old stuff, i move them to the toolchain overlay. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
