On 24/11/2012 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote: > Diego, remember the original point. It is obvious that a common > syntax is more coherent and thus easier for the world to understand. > Having that would be a good thing. It is also obvious that the ruby > syntax is problematic in the general case.
And the Ruby syntax has been devised to suit the _installed commands_ for the most part: ruby18 and ruby19 are _the commands you run_. We're not going to change it just because. So stop trying to use us as an example. Thank you very much, -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
