> The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything > I've been doing lately. Nope ;) I knew that, but as far as I read some of your emails, it was thoughts that you protect udev+sysD integration and followed udev's functionality downgrade.
> So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected. Sorry, if I write it in that manner, that last part looks like adressed to you. I tried to write it mostly for GregKH and people, that protect SystemD-way distro-development path. > And let this be a reminder that you can still disagree with the "systemd > everywhere, and only" crowd while still not becoming laughing stock. And, by the way, I doubt, that people "laugh" about eudev (previously named udev-ng) creation. Mostly they just can't understand why gentoo devs created third udev's fork, where it was already done (and maintained) fork for LFS (somewhere on bitbucket)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
