On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:40:25 -0300 Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:03:51 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:46:41 -0300 > > Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > I actually do like the concept but I'm not sure we can reach > > > consensus about '*DEPEND vs DEPENDENCIES'; a possibility to get > > > people used to it could be to have two parallel EAPIs, like 6 and > > > 6-dependencies, where the former will keep the old style and the > > > latter use DEPENDENCIES. > > > > With eclasses supporting both of them? That's more than crazy. > > depstr=cat/foo > > case $EAPI in > *-dependencies) DEPENDENCIES="build+run: $depstr";; > *) DEPEND="$depstr" > RDEPEND="$depstr";; > esac Yes, we have many eclasses where this is actually the only expected result. Maybe start with python.eclass, that should be quite an extreme example. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
