On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 00:18:07 +0200 Fabio Erculiani <lx...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > > > For optional dependencies, I'm pretty happy with the > > "runtime-switchable USE flags" proposal: > > > > https://gist.github.com/2945569 > > runtime-switchable USE flags for optional dependencies o.O? It sounds > like using a spoon to eat spaghetti to me. > I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why > introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs to > *DEPEND? Because otherwise you can't use USE flags. The rationale is there. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
