-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:11:54 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Both of the flags (except for gift AFAICS) refer to asynchronous DNS >> resolution. Could we join them into one flag? I think we should retain >> 'adns', move appropriate 'ares' flags to it and modify the description >> to make it less library-centric. > > We've reached agreement with Rick and I have committed the new USE=adns > description. I will open bugs to migrate the few affected packages > soon. > > After a bit of discussion, we think it may be also useful to enable > USE=adns by default in some profile to let it benefit users. >
To easy sanity existing ebuilds with USE=ares should change that to USE=adns. For things which are currently actually using adns, I believe migrating USE=adns to USE=libadns to allow users to specifically pick the (afaik deprecated) library. Thanks, ZC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQP+rSAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKip8QAKaHAWEDTq2vaaZto8Nz+7z7 1149IiAYzqkSotw4k7fgaXL97LpOws0PpdgCSOf27Y28IrECo5cUUgZFcObhP9K8 +WnFhxIlduWSXdgH+HulUiTOmNrupf2IcD607ZWbnzUIIr3oeZn0qlkt+aqaLXSJ MM4pf+JU39yo3Iau/35w/ooz2AQDDYOpEpwmBdwt6KHlQVCACCoKxPks3fUaliq+ Zf1vd69bA4zdvqij2KCq4WFADEYNiwJ7MC5bNTX3PURASKLIgVVodjpWz7QUMNA+ WOJ92o8qHDragXiWqq2doKmmPx3B3JzFklIp2HPtA18nsrCtNB2y6anvIs9Vpg2t C072NaFxEy4PUQ7Zx9TmJP8huGy2FlAKxckqcjD28wCZ7G4yXDh9TaHZ/d4uLcqB h1KghP31oN7vfsDPDdHtTGqr5x4hP2tRDqnLZq9tfka78NWdtY7r1Kgx3uxbBeTS eyOm7il8rDlDAV0bNwOyTN1/rU5Zy4bSg1KdiE1d4tK3oTKCXdQspEoGrDcKyTIu WjugQ4euO6qIKj+aGSo9ft6fCm+BIqSgKQf48VpHtfp+QKOOq9KW2yj8bjwIuo+m IjHCF8DsfdJb3C9PHNgPMFMXhCbSHgVJMJR5nAbEkOR6EjaxNGcS0xJmKkQs0PCS KcMP+yKml5IKVDNjF4HE =RdUV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
