On 29/08/2012 15:16, Michał Górny wrote: >>> > > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some pkgconf >>> > > support directly into gcc, in form of '-something libfoo' to make >>> > > it grab everything magically, I think. >> > >> > You have a future as a comedian. > Sir, you are going too far.
I'm just saying that relying on something like that is a ludicrous notion. Okay so somebody might actually try to do that, not going to debate that — people have been out of their mind before. But developers actually relying on it? I find it very hard, as that basically means you're introducing build systems that only ever work on a theoretical GCC 4.8 _and nothing else_. So can you see what makes me laugh in your statement? -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
