On 19/08/2012 20:07, Mike Frysinger wrote: > gnutls is not valid and i will not wait for it. boost i'll give the > maintainer time to resolve as the patch to boost-1.49 can be made to work, > but > it's not that great, and there are already plans on moving boost-1.50 to > unstable which is all i need.
The same applies to GnuTLS 3, you know — would be nice if you fixed the games, and the other packages you maintain, that break with it. For reference these are the other two trackers: http://bugs.gentoo.org/alias/gnutls-3 http://bugs.gentoo.org/alias/boost-1.50 FWIW GnuTLS 3.1 is perfectly fine to go into ~arch IMHO as I've been using it for a while and most of the bugs are only present on gnutls USE flag turned on (and not for all SSL support). -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes [email protected] — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
