On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:45:56 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:44:49 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > As some of you may have noticed, lately introduced 'double include > > preventions' have caused changes in effective phase functions in a > > few ebuilds. Also, often it is undesirable that change in inherits > > of an eclass may cause an undesired change of exported functions. > > The problem here is that eclasses aren't clearly split between > "utility" and "does stuff", so people are inheriting "does stuff" > eclasses to get utilities. The fix is to stop having stupidly huge > complicated eclasses; changing inherit behaviour is just wallpapering > over the gaping hole. Soo, how do you propose to handle bug 422533 without changing inherit behavior? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
