On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:18 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/01/2012 06:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:13:43 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >> >>> We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing >>> verbose build log for that which was approved: >>> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml >>> >>> >>> > Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497 >>> >>> I opened a tracker >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308 >>> >>> Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote >>> on that https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332 >> >> PMS doesn't have such a thing as a 'policy'. Gentoo can have one, >> and I believe that should be discussed per Gentoo policy. >> > > So that would simply mean we add that information to the devmanual? > > Should I open a bug with a devmanual patch then?
FFS, do not spam base-system yet again with stuff that's in the process of being discussed still. Additionally, this is something that should be fixed on the EAPI/eclass level and NOT per package. Putting EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" in EVERY package is epically moronic. Make econf automatically use --disable-silent-rules. -- Doug Goldstein
