William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:13:06PM -0500, Dale wrote: >> William Hubbs wrote: >>> >>> This is not quite correct. The initramfs is required because of [1]. >>> >>> >>> William >>> >> Where is [1]? > [1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken > > We have a way around this in some limited circumstances with > busybox[sep-usr], but that definitely does not support anything fancy > like rade, lvm, etc. > > William >
Ah, read that link a while back. Nothing new there I don't guess. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
