On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote: > Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted: > > Profiles do not set a "default bootloader" so I have no idea what you > > are talking about. > > I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was > a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a default in the > profiles packages file, but either there was but it's long gone, or I'm > mis-remembering entirely.
long gone when we threw out old style virtuals -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
