On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the > > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of > > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to > > > bring in a newer GCC and so on. > > > > And what problems is that causing for you? > > The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a > newer version" than -r200 It is a newer version. That's why it has a newer revision. > and that the jruby implementation is not "a > newer version" than the ruby 1.8 implementation. And that's another thing which is ugly and should be replaced by something sane rather than worked around. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
