On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:16:13 +0200
Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> What we *also* need is to document this requirements to let people
> present that work directly instead of losing days figuring out what is
> needed or what not

The requirement is that the PMS team needs to be able to understand the
proposal, and that someone needs to do however much work is necessary
(which varies massively from proposal to proposal -- multilib is
at least a thousand times more complicated than adding a new function
that outputs stuff based upon a use flag) to be able to present it in a
form acceptable to the Council. That's all there is to it. There is no
lengthy form P123b.5 to fill in or anything like that.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to