2012/6/17 Justin <j...@gentoo.org>:
> On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>> 2012/6/17 Justin <j...@gentoo.org>:
>>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
>>>> flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
>>>> bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
>>>
>>> Is this really necessary? I never experienced any problems which need
>>> this when following the guides. I looks like a hack, because something
>>> else is borked.
>>
>> I've just hit binutils on OpenBSD not finding libdl.so installed in
>> $EPREFIX/usr/lib/ because of this.
>> Don't tell me that OpenBSD prefix is unsupported, i'm working on
>> getting it supported.
>>
>
> I am still not convinced. libdl.so is provided by glibc, at least on my
> linux system. And glibc is one of the rare packages which needs to be
> provided by the host system instead of being installed in the prefix.
>
> Is there something different on BSD which makes libdl.so appear inside
> the prefix?
At least on OpenBSD dlopen() is not in libdl.so, but in ld.so itself,
so I have to install dummy libdl.so to ${EPREFIX}/usr/lib.
I think we should use Fabian's solution from the bug, if it does not
cause any unwanted consequences.
