On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 23:49:52 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Of course, if the community insists, I could just update the old
> eclass and fix the ebuilds broken that way.
The following ebuilds would need fixing if -r1 is to replace -r0
in place:
a) naming the tarball ${P}-src.tar.gz:
- dev-java/jna,
- dev-python/ws4py.
They could be easily fixed by either renaming the destination file (it
shouldn't collide with anything, I think) or setting appropriate S=.
b) downloading .zip for no good reason:
- dev-util/ninja (betagarden overlay).
If the eclass is to spread, there are two more packages in gx86 using
zipballs (which would not be supported by -r1).
All the packages mentioned above are from github so they could be
easily changed to grab tarballs instead.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
