On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:42:29 -0700 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> It seems like you're trying to make glib fit your SLOT operator > >> model, even though it's a natural fit for the ABI_SLOT operator > >> model. > > > > No, I'm trying to strongly encourage people to make proper use of > > slots to avoid having mass breakages and annoyances on user > > systems, even if it means more work for developers. > > But aren't you also trying to make them deviate from upstreams' > release models?
Only if upstream are cowboys who go out of their way to make it hard to slot things. > > Broken linkage due to an upgrade really shouldn't happen. > > It's certainly not ideal, but wouldn't it be useful to have the > flexibility to accommodate it? Let's be practical. Blockers plus SLOT provides that flexibility. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
