On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > In that regard, git is nothing like for instance svn, where branches come > at a much higher cost, as does merging between them.
That's wrong. SVN branches are just about as cheap as git branches, although merges used to be much more painful. I'm not sure how good merging in recent SVN is. Let's please stay a little on-topic? The migration will get there much faster if we don't succumb to feature creep. Cheers, Dirkjan
