On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:29:34 -0400
Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Samuli Suominen
> <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 05/23/2012 05:36 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> One person doesn't do entries.  OMG let's remove it!
> >>
> >
> > absolutely because inconsitency renderess the file useless
> >
> 
> Well, for now the solution is to enforce following policy.
> 
> For the future, perhaps the policy's time has ended.  Sure, Changelogs
> can be handy, but they are increasingly redundant and scm comments
> have the potential to be far more useful.  By all means require
> meaningful scm commit comments, but if Changelog files are holding us
> back either auto-generate them or ditch them.

ChangeLogs could be fine for ebuilds. But for more broad cases like
eclasses, one can usually have a set of changes prepared for commit.
With CVS, it's PITA but with git it's already much better. Of course,
it all fails if every commit has to update a randomly changed, shared
file called ChangeLog...

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to