On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > > > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > > > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but > > > sometimes users have patches which touch autoconf files but my > > > existing patch set doesn't so I'm not calling eautoreconf. Does > > > anyone have a suggested way to handle this? > > > > just always call it when the user applies patches. i don't see a big > > deal. epatch_user && eautoreconf > > No configure.{ac,in} present!
if the package doesn't have configure.{ac,in} files, then why would he be talking about eautoreconf ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.