On 03/31/12 23:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:30:07 +0800 > Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> So you think Gentoo should advertise as "the chances of it working >>> are greater than 0%"? >> >> I said better ... not repetitive trolls. >> >> If you cared about making things better you'd spend more time writing >> patches and less time trying to pick fights on public mailinglists :) >> >> But I guess small minds, small pleasures ... > > What Gentoo needs is less immediate writing of patches and more careful > thinking about how a complex mess of sort-of working, poorly > interacting features can be unified into a smaller number of correct, > coherent concepts. Right now most of the patches are fixing screwups in > earlier patches that were caused by implementing the wrong thing (and > often introducing new problems along the way). > > The fact that you have code that does something does not automatically > imply that doing it is a good idea. >
... and now we train not sending private messages to public mailing lists again, mmmhkay? After so many years you still accidentally do such things on purpose. Not cool.
