El mar, 13-03-2012 a las 11:52 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > On 03/11/2012 05:49 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > If people want to enforce the eapi1 is no longer used in the gentoo > > repo, that's fine- we stick a list of acceptable EAPI's into > > its layout.conf. > > That sounds pretty reasonable, although I think a deprecation warning > would be more appropriate that an outright ban. A deprecation warning > should be sufficient to send the intended message, without placing an > unnecessary burden on people doing simple version bumps or adding > ebuilds that are already well tested though they happen to use an older > EAPI.
I fully agree with this approach
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
