On 03/14/2012 11:36 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:58, Matthew Summers > <quantumsumm...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Why is an in-kernel initramfs so bad anyway? I am baffled. Its quite >> nice to have a minimal recovery env in case mounting fails, etc, etc, >> etc. > > There is nothing bad about initramfs. I think that you are misreading > the arguments above.
Whatever the arguments may be, the whole discussion boils down to the fact that the only people who seem to have a "problem" are those that have a separate /usr partition and simultaneously refuse to use an initramfs. -- Thanks, Zac
