On 12 March 2012 22:37, Kent Fredric <kentfred...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can somebody present a real ( or even theoretical ) problem that could > arise from having the EAPI in the filename that isn't some abstract > hand-waving? > > Not trying to be a troll here, but really, I still haven't seen any.
This isn't a real-world problem, but we're arguably over-loading too much information into the filename already; - package name - package version - ebuild revision - (EAPI?)
