On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:00:32 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Zac Medico wrote: > > If we do go with a variant of GLEP 55, I'd prefer a variant that > > uses a constant extension (like .eb) and places the EAPI string > > just after the version component of the name. For example: > > > foo-1.0-r1-eapi5.ebuild > > This is so ugly... I guess I'll retire the same day when such an > abomination gets accepted. ;-) > > (Still better than the original variant of GLEP 55 though.)
I'm sorry, we're down to "it's ugly and someone already said no and I'll throw my toys out of the pram if I don't get my way" as the arguments against GLEP 55 now? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
