On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:36:24 +0000 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:41:02 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > A major change like this needs more notice than this. The news > > > item should give some reasonable notice of the change to give > > > people time to get their initramfs setup working and tested > > > before it is needed in anger. > > > > Maybe the ebuild should try to autodetect broken systems and prevent > > merge then. > > I use an initramfs, it does not mount /usr. The initramfs is embedded > in the kernel file. How would the ebuild evaluate that? It would just say 'You seem to have separate /usr. Please ensure you have a working initramfs which mounts it, and set FOOBARBAZ=yes in your make.conf then'. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
