On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:59:33 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetrom...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:29 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > And you believe that having exactly one place inside ebuild text > > where there are different whitespace, quoting and indenting rules > > for something that otherwise looks exactly like any other metadata > > variable isn't going to cause problems? > > In light of the fact that all 29758 ebuilds in portage already satisfy > the proposed whitespace, quoting, and indenting constrains on EAPI > assignment, the probability of problems appears to be vanishingly > small. And "vanishingly small" and can be reduced to zero by simply > adding a check to repoman.
Because they were recently changed, presumably... https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402167#c36 We had this discussion the last time around too, and people were told to assign in a particular way. As you can see, it didn't work. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
