On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > As such, I disagree with floppym that the handbook's kernel module > section needs updating for this, too. The handbook doesn't even deal > with non-default dev-managers, nor does it mention module-init-tools, it > just assumes it's there. Udev, as the default dev-manager, will be > pulling in kmod already, with its default module-init-tools compatibility > meaning no change in documentation necessary. Only if we're going to > start giving users dev-manager alternatives in the handbook does it > become an issue, and while that would be nice, I don't think it's > necessary for this change.
Yes, I did not think that through. If kmod gets pulled in via udev in the stage3 tarballs, the docs are fine as-is.
