On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Richard Yao <r...@cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote: >> Am I the only paranoid person who moves them rather than unlinking >> them? Oh, if only btrfs were stable... > > Is this a reference to snapshots? You can use ZFS for those. The > kernel modules are only available in the form of 9999 ebuilds right > now, but they your data should be safe unless you go out of your way > to break things (e.g. putting the ZIL/SLOG on a tmpfs). Alternatively, > there is XFS, which I believe also supports snapshots. >
I've been using btrfs exclusively for about 6 months, and I don't *think* I've lost anything... :)
