On 12/16/2011 06:06 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add >> arches after a "time out". > Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just > point > out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and > maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho. > > I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin > said, > all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch > other stuff. > > If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to > mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix. > > Regards > Agostino Hi ago,
Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that it respects C/LDFLAGS. If so, that's useful and would help package maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization. And congrats on making dev :) -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : [email protected] GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 GnuPG ID : D0455535
