On 10/14/11 12:39 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:29:19PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, "Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr." >> <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 support in >>> python.eclass yet? >>> >>> I understand you have some complicated patches in flight etc etc, but >>> are they _required_ for the eclass not to break with EAPI 4? >>> >>> My point is that I'd like to use pkg_pretend in packages that use >>> python.eclass and I can't (for a long time). Unless there are really >>> important reasons like breakages I think we should really make >>> python.eclass support EAPI=4. >> >> Two weeks and no response from python@? > > You probably should've cc'd them.
CC-ing python@ then (but I expect the developers to follow gentoo-dev anyway). In case of no response, I plan to submit the thing to the council agenda. I think the parts of python eclass that I use should work with EAPI 4.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
