On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Hans de Graaff <gra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:00 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Hans de Graaff <gra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > One integration that might also be useful is what we track on the ruby >> > wiki currently: https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/ruby/wiki/PendingBumps >> > which is a collection of quick notes on problems encountered while >> > bumping packages. The ability to attach notes to packages and to >> > acknowledge version bumps (and e.g. make them yellow instead of red) >> > could help with larger lists for herds. > >> You can already use that page: http://euscan.iksaif.net/herds/ruby/ > > I think you missed my point. This page is more like what we have at > http://moving-innovations.com/~graaff/outdated-gems/ which is an > automated list based on what is in the tree and upstream. Your page is a > good replacement for that so we may just use that in the future. > > What our wiki page does it keep *notes* on these bumps, so all of that > relies on manual input. (e.g. "we tried to bump this but it needs a new > dependency that we don't have yet.") The euscan page doesn't support > that yet. Arguably I should open bugs for each of these bumps, but that > seems like a lot of overhead for some quick notes.
Right, having a stable API and a special euscan tag on the wiki could solve that. -- Corentin Chary http://xf.iksaif.net
