On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:01:43 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2011 10:06:07 Michał Górny wrote: > > But doesn't switching mean we're going to hit LFS PITA once again? > > LFS hasnt really been a pain in a long while. but it's something worth > raising on the x32 lists (which i'll do) since x32 has native 64bit support > (uint64_t == %rax). so there should be no need to have 32bit interfaces at > all for read funcs.
actually, this is already done. in my libx32 libc.so.6, the 64bit ver is an alias to the 32bit ver. 5790: 000cff00 210 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 11 openat64 6755: 000cff00 210 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 11 openat 6055: 000d07c0 92 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 11 creat 6595: 000d07c0 92 FUNC WEAK DEFAULT 11 creat64 so no, there shouldnt be any LFS issues with x32. all file offsets are 64bit. granted, if code does something like "int x = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_CUR)", it'll break. but that's irrelevant to x32 ... that's broken for all 32bit systems. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
