On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Now that we don't have any old-style virtuals in gx86 anymore, > I think the 'virtual' category is basically one another plain category > nowadays. > > Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, maybe it > would be a good idea to split it a little? What I'm proposing is maybe > creating some kind of '*-virtual' categories. > > For example, half of the current virtuals are prefixed with 'perl-'. > Maybe they could be transformed into 'perl-virtual/*'?
why? > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny >
