On Saturday, August 13, 2011 01:41:54 Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 7 August 2011 17:20, Raúl Porcel wrote: > > With subprofiles we could keyword such packages, mask them globally on > > arm and unmask it on the subprofile of the subarchitecture that supports > > it. > > I think this makes sense. What would the policy be on initial keywords > if upstream doesn't explicitly specify what sub-arches are supported? > Just enable on all till someone says it doesn't work or test on all of > them first or ...?
we arent talking diff keywords ... there will still be just "arm". the simplest approach is probably fine: don't worry about masking unless someone complains or the dev in question feels like digging into things. it's not like having the package generally available will cause people any additional problems ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
