On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:58:56 -0700 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 8/2/11 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:19:03 -0700 > > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> I'm interested in some sort of suggested/recommend deps for > >> www-client/chromium, but I'm not sure if eclass is the right > >> implementation. > > I don't think we can start drafting until we agree on one solution. > > AFAICS there are two major ideas: > > 1) using special USEflags for that (which I can draft if you like), > > 2) copying DEPENDENCIES syntax from exherbo. I guess there's nothing > > special to draft here, only to decide on how much to copy. > > > > First gives you compat and handles all the cases, second one either > > doesn't handle everything or forces a completely new syntax. > > I think I prefer the second option (copying from Exherbo). A better > integration with the package manager than USE flags should result in a > better user experience. Are you willing to update and EAPI-bump all the eclasses? May I remind you that most of them don't even go beyond EAPI 0? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
