On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:10:27 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> * Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto schrieb am 01.08.11 um 11:19 Uhr: > > I agree with Eray. Furthermore, please stop trying to reverse "the > > game". It's those that want to break existing policies and > > conventions that have to justify why they want to do that, not > > those that want to keep using what has worked for years. > > I wouldn't call the current static -workarounds, and files from / > using files from /usr, neither a clean solution or working Not to mention there are no 'libexec' nor 'share' directories in rootfs which means files get randomly misplaced. And I don't really think that introducing new directories in / is a good solution. One thing we should consider as well is /opt. It seems like moving data from it into /usr should be a good idea too. This is also annoying to separate /usr users wanting to have a small rootfs -- as they either have to hack /opt out of rootfs or introduce just an another filesystem for it. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
