On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:27 -0700 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 12:59 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:11:43 +0200 > >> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > >>> So go claim your commits, > >> > >> Great work! > >> > >>> [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/gentoo > >>> [2] > >>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary > >> > >> It appears they count rather more commits than does CIA - Manifest > >> commits look to be the likely cause. > >> > > > > Another reason for all of us to move to gpg signed manifests — > > another commit free with every ebuild commit! > > Well, even without the signing step, the Manifest has to be committed > separately because the cvs $Header thing causes the ebuild digest to > change as soon as it is committed. But signing quite often implies typing in password, especially if it's the first signature done in the session. That means more delay, and thus more likely for the commit to be taken as a separate one. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
