On Sun, 1 May 2011 13:43:25 -0700
Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Beyond that... I suspect *everyone* would appreciate optimization
> done to echangelog. From a quick look... seems like it's cvs status,
> than a cvs diff. Trying to collapse that into a single op, falling
> back to status might not be a bad thing (or parallelizing the
> requests so the slowness of cvs doesn't cause sequentially stack up).
>
> Either way.. fix the tool, rather than just doing the wrong thing.
I couldn't figure out what could possibly make echangelog slow, but then
I figured that this fix is easy and outside the scope of echangelog:
ssh -f -n -N master-cvs.gentoo.org
Doing only one of the cvs commands might help too, of course.
jer
