On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote: > >> please have a look at the attached patch. > >> -EAPI="1" >> +EAPI="4" > > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style" > to "EAPI 2 style" too?
If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point? From an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no benefit. Why not just deal with that in a future revision? I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI simply because 4 > 1. Rich
