On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote:
>
>> please have a look at the attached patch.
>
>> -EAPI="1"
>> +EAPI="4"
>
> Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style"
> to "EAPI 2 style" too?
If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month
waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point?  From
an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no
benefit.  Why not just deal with that in a future revision?

I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI
simply because 4 > 1.

Rich

Reply via email to