On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 09:42:25AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:39:55AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > I can live with that, as long as the responsibility that packages work > > with dependencies from overlays stays entirely with the overlay's > > maintainer. > > Good point. Agreed. > > > But could you please add a comment in the virtual's ebuild where (i.e. > i> in which overlay) the additional dependencies can be found? > > Done.
Better yet, why don't welook into moving those packages from the overlays into the main tree? William
pgpvT6IRCv2W3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
