On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 06:08:53PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
> > Manifest's anymore ?  generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is
> > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have
> > done this already.
> 
> I didn't know we still allowed that.. I guess the CVS server should just
> reject unsigned Manifests..

Reject, and email an alias of folk who will go fix the manifest.  Keep 
in mind since it's a two stage commit for cvs, the checksums are left 
out of sync if we just flat out reject unsigned manifests and ignore 
the fallout.

~brian

Attachment: pgppq4AHvuvro.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to