On Saturday, March 12, 2011 07:36:35 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > I wonder why pax-utils.eclass uses elog instead of just einfo. An > example message looks like this: > > * Fallback PaX marking -m > * out/Release/chrome > > IMHO it's not very useful in the elog messages, but maybe there are > scenarios in which it is useful. > > My idea is to just replace all elogs with einfos in pax-utils.eclass. > What do you think?
i think it depends on the person. for people who dont use grsec/PaX, they probably could care less and never see this output. for people who do, they probably do want to see this. maybe have it `elog` only when [[ $(uname -r) == *-grsec* ]] -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
