On 05/03/11 19:52, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbh...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkh...@gentoo.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb     , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for
>>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you
>>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use
>>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same
>>>> effect.
>>>
>>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected
>>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd.
>>>
>>
>> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which
>> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using
>> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date.
>>
> 
> I've started maintaining an irregularly updated list for gtk+ (and a
> few other libraries):
> 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~nirbheek/gnome/3.0/slotting/
> 
> The script I use to generate these lists is:
> 
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/slot_rindex.py;hb=HEAD
> 
> If you look at the lists in that directory, you'll be able to guess
> that there are other libraries which need the same treatment. The list
> of these libraries is, however, incomplete right now. We'll be sending
> a mail about that later, but folks can fix deps to use slots right now
> if they wish.
> 
> Thanks to everyone who has fixed deps of their (and other folks') packages!
> 

all sci is fixed.

Why do you have a rdeps list for vte. it is in slot 0. Will there be a
different slot in future?

justin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to