On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:14:59 -0600
Donnie Berkholz <dberkh...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 14:17 Wed 16 Feb , Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > I think automatically generating per-arch lists and dumping them
> > on the bug is a nice way to do it. Having a "tabled list" for use
> > by the maintainer and then generating one comment per
> > arch-specific list seems like a good idea to me. Yes it is more
> > verbose on the bug, but that is a little price to pay, I'd say.
+1 :)
> Is using autounmask an option instead? That generates a nice little
> file with everything that was actually unmasked, assuming it's a
> single dependency tree of packages.
autounmask takes ages on slow systems.
jer
